Tuesday, September 12, 2006

The State: Class Notes

THE STATE

Max Weber: Monopoly on violence

----A set of political institutions to generate and carry out policy

----Typically highly institutionalized (explain!)

-----Has army, policy, taxation, judiciary, social-welfare system

(give example of Russian taxes - does this make a state?)

-----SOVEREIGN

Sovereignty: Ability to carry out actions of policies within a territory independently from external actors or internal rivals

External actors: Other countries (China and Tibet example)

Internal actors: competing regions, competing political characters, rebel movements (Georgia: Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Ajaria)

According to international law, a state has three requirements:

1. A PERMANENT population

2. A DEFINED territory

3. A GOVERNMENT capable of maintaining effective control over its territory, AND conducting international relations with other states

Give examples of: Israel, Nigeria, China (Uighurs), United States - do they fit all of these requirements?

Doesn't mean definition of state isn't accurate - just that very few states fit this description perfectly

Ten functions of the state:

total monopoly on violence - but must be used wisely, must have checks and balances to counterbalance the threat of force to be trusted by citizens

Administrative control - breadth/depth of state's control over territory, seen in division of responsibilities throughout country

Management of Public Finances - must be managed to adequately provide resources, must not rely on external sources for funds.

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE STATES have budgets that determine the state's priorities

Investments in human capital - citizens must feel a PART of the government and governing structure - must be INVESTED in the state to make it work. Otherwise, risk DISENFRANCHISEMENT.

DELINEATION OF CITIZEN RIGHTS/DUTIES - can be best achieved when governments seek to create EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY for all

PROVISION OF INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES - transport, water, power - citizens can participate in state activities, economy will flourish

FORMATION OF THE MARKET - facilitates growth of trade and economy - establish property rights, laws governing economic exchange

Example gone wrong: in post-communist world, there was no protection for entrepreneurs, no laws, it was mayhem and stymied economic growth

MANAGE ASSETS OF THE STATE - refers to states ability to license and regulate industry. In licensing, enables businesses to flourish while protecting the consumer. In regulating, maintains quality control AND facilitates globalization

AUTHORITY OVER INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS - entering into treaties and public borrowing, to benefit the public and expand industries and trade

Problem: Quebec seeks its own relations with nations, goes above Canada

RULE OF LAW - implies that government authority may ONLY be exercised in accordance with written laws, which were adopted through established procedure. Leaders and elites are NOT above the law.

----------------

A REGIME is different.

We usually associate it with DICTATORSHIPS (Nazi regime, Baathist regime)

But, a REGIME is the fundamental rules and NORMS of politics.

Go over NORMS. -- determines what is RIGHT and APPROPRIATE behavior in a society

REGIMES are the rules of norms regarding individual power, collective freedom, and how power is to be attained and used

Institutionalized, but can be changed by major events

Go over institutionalization

Events: revolution, gross abuse of power, economic collapse

France and the Fifth Regime, South Africa post-apartheid

: Democratic Regime: freedom of the people, elections, accountability

variances: US, Canada, UK

Authoritarian Regime: no freedom, decrees, centralized power, abuse of power

variances: China, Cuba, Uzbekistan

DO A SPECTRUM HERE

GOVERNMENT

Give example of working in British Parliament - when the Thatcher government fell....

Leadership that runs the state

Weakly institutionalized

Thatcherite reforms were largely reversed by Blair

Characterized by President/PM/Dictator

Limited by existing regime - discuss

--------

DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE

With the exception of Antarctica, every stretch of land is now controlled by one state or another

How did we get here?

Political organization:

May have originated due to environment and agriculture, switched from nomad to sedentary

Suddenly, the problem of LIMITED RESOURCES became very important

Increasing specialisation of human beings – who decides who farms?

Economic problems like surpluses - WHO gets WHAT?

Collective security vs. individual freedom - how to navigate?

Had to reconcile freedom and equality

Monopoly of force evolved

Why did humans become political communities?

Thomas Hobbes: "social contract" to over come anarchy – could not be revoked

Jean-Jacques Rousseau: "Social contract" - between ruler and ruled, once ruler violated contract, it was annulled

John Locke: Social contract theory based on fundamental rights in state of nature, said government should be limited to preventing private property

Karl Marx: political community exploitative, rich take advantage of the poor, striving for fully equal society outside of politics altogether

Coercion vs. consensus

Is any state based on truly one or the other? Also reintroduce the spectrum

Development of modern state-

Roman empire collapses

Institutions disappear

Dark Ages

a chance to start from scratch

organized crime was rampant - people organized different ways to protect themselves

Eventually, settled on the state, a new form of political organization

Three advantages:

A. ENCOURAGED economic development

realized feudal system wasn't making it, so privatized land and created incentives for higher productivity

B. Encouraged TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION

inbcreases productivity

C. HOMOGENIZATION of people in territories

printing press enabled people to think of themselves as "one nation"

stability made intrastate traveling easier

beginning of colonisation

decreasing power of R.C. church

Treaty of Westphalia:

Signed in 1648, established the nation-state as we know it today

Background:

Europe is broken into several empires: Spain, Holy Roman Empire, etc

Each went to war with each other for a variety of reasons, one of which being religion

Tried to establish which Christian religion was "right"

Treaty ended that

Basically said: Whatever religion the prince of a region is, so his subjects will be

So basic achievements of Treaty:

--- à States are based on TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY - all territory within a border is subject to law of governing state

- à States are INDEPENDENT and must be respected by other states

-- à Made International Relations SECULAR (within Europe at least)

-- àGave state monopoly on WAR

Another change -

Treaty of Versailles - introduced the idea that states shouldn't be ALL sovereign without limit - League of Nations, but failed because of lack of commitment by member states

Turning Point: World War II - recognized absolute sovereignty could be disastrous, UN, beginnings of EU

Evolution of States:

Use map

These did not ALWAYS exist.

States EVOLVE and CHANGE with political change

Examples: Empires, USSR

German history - Weimar Republic - Nazi Germany/Third Reich - West Germany/East Germany - Federal Republic of Germany

COMPARING STATE POWER

States vary in power...why?

Legitimacy

"The property states possess when their citizens view their sovereignty as appropriate, proper, or acceptable"

based on CONSENT

examples for and against – French, Spanish govt is legitimate. Azerbaijan and Lebanon – not legitimate

Three forms of legitimacy:

1. Traditional

2. Charismatic

3. Rational-legal

1. Traditional

-Max Weber

-present in long-existing systems

Monarchy in France - ancien regime - always that way

- ritual and continuity

2. Charismatic

- based on the power of ideas, and how those ideas are presented

- Adolf Hitler - very sympathetic character to Germans victimized by Versailles

- usually dies with the charismatic leader, unless leader builds up a ritualistic system to keep power in place (ex: Mao's China)

3. Rational-legal

- Based on rules and laws that are highly institutionalized

- elections in advanced democratic states (US, UK, Germany)

- depends on OFFICE, not INDIVIDUAL

- therefore, TRANSFER OF POWER is very easy

- very hard in newly democratized states, ex: Nigeria, Kenya

All sorts of political figures with legitimacy can be found in rational-legal states.

Charismatic: Al Sharpton

Traditional: Kennedys, Bushes, Queen Elizabeth II

Without legitimacy, states would have to COERCE citizens to follow its rules - example, Uzbekistan, high imprisonment rate, Iran relies on extensive police to enforce its laws

Centralisation vs Decentralisation

Federalism vs unitary states

- devolves decision-making to lower orders (states, provinces, Lander) Federalism

US, Germany

- decide everything on the central level, with little to no local authorityUnitary states

Examples: UK (before 1997), Japan, Norway

Strong states vs weak states

: can defend territory, make/enforce rules, collect taxes, manage economyStrong states

Ask examples.

: can't do these things - bad at taxes - bad at justice - bad at resource allocationWeak states

Failed states possible

Two big definitions:

: refers to ability of state to wield power in order to carry out basic tasks of providing security and reconciling freedom and equality CAPACITY

: ability of the state to wield power independent of the publicAUTONOMY

Democracies try to balance the two

?Debate Questions: Is it the state's responsibility to promote equality

US vs Norway

Should states try to help us be ethical? Should they legislate morality?

Christian right vs. Taleban in Afghanistan

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home